Any "fortune telling" is a kind of forecasting. In fact, it is kind of

赫生童子

	Any "fortune telling" is a kind of forecasting. In fact, it is kind of estimate rather than prophecy. It is absolutely impossible to predict. Author :Chang Kai-Chi Project are developed by human, and the people are the dominate of project. How could project/event exist without people? However, too many fortune tellers mistakenly think, or deliberately think that "fortune telling" can accurately predict the future. This is absolutely wrong. (Even some fortune tellers claim to be "forecasters", that is total bullshit!) The three major religions of the Abraham system are all beliefs that "everything is pre-determined by God", so they oppose the fortune of believers. This doctrine is to assert and firmly believe in "absolute pre-determination", rather than "partially pre-determined, partially open-minded". Therefore, the phrase "self-effort can change destiny" is popular only after modern religious authority is not that strong.  People are getting more and more open, and people are more and more knowledgeable. People know how to question. The "absolute pre-determination" theory cannot fully explain the world's difficulties and personal encounters. Overall, either “everything is predetermined”, or “nothing is predetermined” is true. It is not reasonable to assume that “some are predetermined, and some are decided by human effort”, otherwise there will no pattern in the world. However, “some are decided by human effort” is opposite to “everything is predetermined”. For example, if a century-old church in a small town in Illinois is razed to the ground by a tornado, is it "pre-determined"? In the past 100 years, there have been countless tornadoes passing by in the vicinity, and there is no damage to this church. Therefore, it is "God's care". This is "pre-determined". Then this time is finally not spared. How to explain it? "Is it the same?" Because it is too old, God wants nearby believers to rebuild a new church? So temporarily changed the original "pre-determined"? Or, God has long been "pre-determined". This church has only one hundred years of life, and it will not work for even one more day. So, when time is up, God immediately create a tornado to end this church? Or, we will regard it as a natural phenomenon. It has not been damaged by a tornado in a hundred years. It is only a matter of chance. This time it has been razed to the ground and it is also a matter of probability. It is a natural phenomenon. There is no God, and there is no "pre-determination". Do you think this is much more more acceptable? and more reasonable!

赫生童子

	任何「算命」都是一種「預測」，事實上也只能「預測」，而不是「預言」，也絕對不可能「預言」 作者:張開基 翻譯員:某君 任何「算命」都是一種「預測」，事實上也只能「預測」，而不是「預言」，也絕對不可能「預言」； 所謂「事在人為」；「人有為，事方在」，「人若不為，事又焉在」？ 但是，太多太多算命者都誤以為；或者故意讓人以為「算命」可以準確「預言」，這是絕對錯誤的。（甚至有些算命者自稱是「預言家」，那是『放屁』！） 亞伯拉罕系統的三大宗教，都是信仰「一切都是神早已前定的」，所以反對信徒算命。 這種教義是主張和堅決信仰「絕對前定論」；而非「部份前定，部份開放人為」的。 所以，「自己努力可以改變命運」的說詞，只是近代宗教威權地位不再，觀念越來越開放，人們越來越有知識，懂得質疑之後；在「絕對前定論」無法圓滿解釋世事難全和個人遭遇多舛之時，一個欲蓋彌彰的牽拖遁詞。 總而言之，要嘛「萬事前定」，要嘛「沒有前定」。不可以「一部分前定，一部分可以自由發揮而改變前定」，如果這樣的說法可以成立，那麼就會變成無限上綱，天下沒有任何事不能解釋了。（又或者，這樣剛好很吊詭的完全推翻了「前定論」）！ 譬如美國伊利諾伊州某小鎮的百年老教堂被龍捲風夷為平地，那麼是不是「前定」呢？ 之前一百年，有無數次龍捲風在附近經過，都沒有損害這教堂，所以是「上帝眷顧」，這是「前定」，那麼這次終於不能倖免，怎麼解釋呢？「也是前定」？因為太老舊了，上帝希望附近信徒重建一所新的教堂？所以臨時改變了原來的「前定」？ 或者，上帝早就「前定」這所教堂只有一百年的壽命，多一天都不行，所以，時間到了，上帝就立即造龍捲風來終結這所教堂？ 又或者；我們就將之當成自然現象，百年間沒有遭到龍捲風損害，只是機率問題，而這次被夷為平地，也是機率問題，都是自然現象，沒有上帝，也沒有什麼「前定」，這樣以為會不會讓人比較容易接受？也比較合理一些？